WCHP Staff Lie to the Police

Okay, this is some new information that now have in my possession.

Before I start I believe that making a deliberate false statement to the Police is perverting the course of justice, or at the very least wasting Police time.

Obviously I don’t expect anyone to follow up on this so I’ll lift the carpet at the end of this post to make it easier for the people concerned to sweep it under.

This is a copy of part of a statement made to Sussex Police on 11/05/2015 by a member of WHCP Management.  To be clear, the statement is completely fabricated, however, unlike others we will stick to the bits that we can prove.

The statement is basically regarding alleged harassment by JM (see earlier in the blog), to do this the WCHP manager (who I won’t name, however, she’s Polish, entered the country illegally and benefited from JM’s dismissal) needed to have a motive for the harassment.

So, to back up the claim of harassment, it makes sense to establish a reason for the harassment, failing facts they’ll have a go at their tried and tested methods (fabrication).

This is a copy of the initial part of the statement (time stamps, etc are removed). Excuse the misspellings, but I’ve copied as written.

BASIC CIRCS. JACQUIE MONAMANY WAS EMPLOYED AS A MANAGER FOR WORHTING CHURCHES HOMELESS PROJECT.

THERE WAS SOME SORT OF DISCIPLINARY CASE AGIANST JACQUIE, WHICH MEANT THE OTHER MEMEBERS OF STAFF WERE REQUIRED TO MAKE STATEMENTS AND GIVE EVIDENCE.

THIS CASE WENT ON FROM JANUARY 2014 WHEN SHE WAS SUSPENDED. JULY WHEN THERE WAS A HEARING AND SHE WAS DISMISSED. THEN MARCH 2015 WHEN THERE WAS NA APPEALS TRIBUNAL, WHICH UPHELD THE DISMISSAL.

Okay, so, the  entire basis for the harassment is that JM was dismissed and lost at tribunal, therefore has an axe to grind.

That is 100% incorrect.  The Tribunal is a matter of record at Southampton Court.  So, I’ll lift the carpet now and WCHP and Sussex Police can sweep away!

Also the “SOME SORT OF DISCIPLINARY” seems to be an attempt for this person to distance themselves from the disciplinary, when they know full well what is was about because they instigated it.

Just one other thing to note is that Sussex Police took action off the back of these statements without checking any of the information or giving the accused a chance to challenge the statements.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in WCHP and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s